Official Fulqrum Publishing forum
Page 14 of 17 « First 41213 14 1516 Last »
Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

Official Fulqrum Publishing forum (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/index.php)
-   IL-2 Sturmovik (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/forumdisplay.php?f=98)
-   -   Non Friday 2010-04-15 Development Update :) (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/showthread.php?t=14390)

genbrien 04-20-2010 03:51 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Feuerfalke (Post 155556)
Because not everybody has a 64bit OS? :confused:
Yes I know.....
that's that that I dont understand. Why people are still picking 32bit OSes if the 64bit give more thing for the same price ????? :confused:
And because there is still 32bit OSes, 64bit is not developping as fast as it should :(

philip.ed 04-20-2010 05:47 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by genbrien (Post 155561)
Yes I know.....
that's that that I dont understand. Why people are still picking 32bit OSes if the 64bit give more thing for the same price ????? :confused:
And because there is still 32bit OSes, 64bit is not developping as fast as it should :(
Because is we have the OS at home, why would we want to spend extra money on a new one? When I bought my laptop, the 64 bit version was a fair-amount more expensive.

genbrien 04-20-2010 10:04 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by philip.ed (Post 155565)
Because is we have the OS at home, why would we want to spend extra money on a new one? When I bought my laptop, the 64 bit version was a fair-amount more expensive.
I just checked 5mins ago, and 64bit is 3$ more than 32bit......:rolleyes:
I'm not saying that you must upgrade to get 64bit, but if you upgrade.... why still chose 32bit.... non sense to me:confused:

Novotny 04-21-2010 01:13 AM
It's a fair point though - why buy Windows 7 32bit? I don't know.

zauii 04-21-2010 06:40 AM
Big deal? 64 vs 32 bit performance wise isn't anything to cheer about anyway.

TheGrunch 04-21-2010 06:52 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by zauii (Post 155652)
big deal? 64 vs 32 bit performance wise isn't anything to cheer about anyway.
ram?

zauii 04-21-2010 07:15 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheGrunch (Post 155656)
ram?
Sure , yet no game(s) really benefits from 3+ gig ram in any significant way.

Stranzki 04-21-2010 07:27 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by zauii (Post 155657)
Sure , yet no game(s) really benefits from 3+ gig ram in any significant way.
Although a little bit extreme, Metro 2033 recommends 8gig ram. Normally you keep your O/S some time, so you must think of the requirements games will have in 1-2 years.

ZaltysZ 04-21-2010 07:55 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by zauii (Post 155657)
Sure , yet no game(s) really benefits from 3+ gig ram in any significant way.
DCS: BS, FC2 can use up to 4GB on x64 OS, because they are "Large address aware". Also, if I recall correctly, FSX SP2 is in the same group too.

genbrien 04-21-2010 12:19 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by zauii (Post 155657)
Sure , yet no game(s) really benefits from 3+ gig ram in any significant way.
you know that the graphical memory in your graphic card is share with your RAM......

so if you have 3gb of ram and and a graphic card with 1gb with a 32bit OS, you wont have acces to all your memory.


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:56 AM.
Page 14 of 17 « First 41213 14 1516 Last »
Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.