A link to the thread would help this busy guy :)

And what if it is good...what then? im not saying it defiantly will be good, i have some worries too, but just what if it really good?

and what if it is still one step above arcade?? all indicators thus far are indicating that is exactly where it will end up... (complete with the dodgy FSX distorted external view FoV ;) )

Why then there would be an extra fee :lol:

Its fine and reasonable to have concerns, I know I do.

But to be bitter if it turns out to be great is just plain stupid.

At the end of the day i like flight sims, otherwise i wouldn't be posting here.....

you'ds have to define 'great' though... as some fanbois (of any genre) think a 15 fps slideshow, that is their (pick one, any one) game, is great

yeah that was the attitude i was referring to

my english is not good enough i meant:

this has been a failure FOR us all

do you imagine no more sims?

in fact its odd they didnt vanish after the microsoft failure

Actually that is a good indicator of a strong and versatile engine...built for some longevity as hardware advance in near future.

lol yes, so they say (and FSX did :) )

i noticed pay per play game can be run in any system while retail needs high end pcs

as a matter of fact when i see the loading screen takes so long i visualize just actually running a back counter underneath which is set on higher the older your system ;)