Official Fulqrum Publishing forum - ATAG Dedicated Server is up!

Official Fulqrum Publishing forum (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/index.php)

- CoD Multiplayer (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/forumdisplay.php?f=192)

- - ATAG Dedicated Server is up! (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/showthread.php?t=21191)

I still much prefer flying my E-1 than the E-4, the 1 is a much steadier gun platform with is 4 mg's than the cannons kicking things around!

Craig

Quote:

Originally Posted by CaptainDoggles (Post 365374)

Keep in mind I said angles tactics. Trying to use energy tactics against the 109 is not a good move unless he's already slow or you have a significant altitude advantage.

No worries, I understand. Using angles tactics against a Hurricane is OK but risky if you meet a good pilot. What I said is that Hurri is not much better at it (my experience and observation) as it's very sluggish at controls, especially rudder and ailerons. Matter of preference, at angles, all depends on how the pilot uses his machine, Hurricane is capable, no doubt.

Using energy tactics is good move at anytime if you know what you're doing. Matter of opinion perhaps and also, I usually try to BnZ the 109s, but even if bounced myself, it is possible to recover and reverse the situation quite often, that was my point. In any situation, you really need to outfly the 109 pilot in order to be succesful as he's got better performing aircraft.

Quote:

Originally Posted by CaptainDoggles (Post 365374)

And in my opinion much larger than the gap between the Hurri and the Emil.

Absolutely!

Quote:

Originally Posted by CaptainDoggles (Post 365374)

"Just" a spitfire is fine and dandy until squadrons start using them with good team tactics, and in good numbers. 6 guys, maybe even as few as 4 guys would have the ability to completely decimate the Axis side.

Just like they use the E-4 at the moment, using good team tactics (and swarming airfields in low alt as the AAA is harmless) and in good numbers. 4 guys decimating the Allied side hands down already. Add few kids vulching (alambash! :D) and you get the everyday ATAGesque picture.

I am not saying I agree with the Mk.IIa. But if the Emils at least bother to gains some alt fearing the Mk.II before they aproach the English coast, I am happy. You don't see many Blue pilots up high because they don't need to atm.

I must say I find I can get shot down equally as well in a spit hurry or 109.:grin:

I was on last night - Spit2 were getting killed. Stats didn't seem that much different and quite a few of us stayed with the MK1a and Rotol Hurris.

Seems that one observation is the increasingly large volume of low level attacks on the allied airfields which were getting out of hand. Check out the the thread on ATAG forum regards the introduction of the Spit Mk2 - jeeez there are only five of them!

Quote:

Originally Posted by cheesehawk (Post 365459)

I think part of the problem is that the Hurricanes and Spitfire I's roles are reversed, and fresh meat that jumps in wanting to fly the "Saviour of Britain" don't realize while it looks like a Spitfire, it actually flies like the Hurricane, and vice versa. The Hurri is faster, climbs better, but the Spitfire is the more maneuverable. Still, I don't think you should introduce a relative monster "Just for the hell of it for awhile". Why not only allow G.50s for awhile instead? You'll have the same enormous advantage in both performance and numbers. I'm betting most of the blue aces stay away.

Well at the end of the day its ATAGs decision but I may jump into a Spit IIa later this evening if its still there just for the fun of it, when I'll be flying alone.

One thing is for sure, well two things....
I hope the next patch puts the FMs close to where they belong.
If it does, there will still be people claiming the other sides a/c are Uber.

Quote:

Originally Posted by klem (Post 365379)

Farber,
by the time of the BoB the Spitfire I wasn't exactly an infant, several improvements like Rotols had been put in on most aircraft although much more was to come. Al Deere in his autobiography describes his first fight with 109Es during the Dunkirk period. He and Johnny Checketts covered a light aircraft rescuing a Squadron CO from the beaches. Johnny went above the low clouds to cover and ran into several (probably two schwarms) of 109Es. He was up to his neck but shot two down before the others made off while one 109E had gone below clouds and fought for several minutes with Al Deere who shot it down. This was in Spitfire Mk1s ! Al Deere was absolutely convinced that in all but climb and dive (mostly cutout problem) the Spitfire I was better than the 109E in that kind of a fight.

So, yes I know the Spit IIa is a big advantage but we don't really have anything to match a properly flown 109. And ATAG are only putting on a few as I understand it.

BUT, roll on the patch :D

Aircraft dont fly themselves...

Next patch will be interesting. :-P

[QUOTE=SEE;365461 jeeez there are only five of them![/QUOTE]

Yeah, imagine the howls if it was a full squadron!:rolleyes:

Quote:

Originally Posted by cheesehawk (Post 365460)

Remember, after 3k, our advantages are negated, why would you want to fly up where the other aircraft perform better? We're already lured up there by bombers (for those that hunt them), but other than that, you want to bring the RAF'ers down to your better envelop, and deny them the altitudes where their platforms perform best.

3k?
Negated?

You seem to be wrong, cheesehawk mate ;)

The FTH of Emil is 4500m, at that alt you still outperform any Mk.I RAF fighter. You'll have significant advantage even at 5000+m although you might find it more difficult to spiral climb from them - yet it's still there and you're safe well above 3000m. Any problem - dive to France.

I had many many great fights on ATAG in both RAF or 109 at 4000m (15000ft), unfortunately large group of Emils never bother to climb to reasonable height, because the don't have to. Just full power 500m HDG Hawkinge, Minengeschoss loaded, lots of 'ground' targets.

Quote:

Originally Posted by cheesehawk (Post 365470)

I wouldn't count on the FM's for next patch, I think 1c revised their graphics engine from being completed this current patch (as they thought it would be during the betas) to having one more go at it next patch. I hope they get the dang engine worked out so they can start looking at the game-play problems soon!

You may be right, I just re-read Luthier's post

I’ll conclude our tonight’s broadcast with a few photos. One shows the ongoing work on our FM;

Operative word being 'ongoing'.

Looks like we may have to wait Farber :P

Quote:

Originally Posted by cheesehawk (Post 365605)

Ugh, who you calling Farber? them's fighting words...

I have no association with the little kids anymore....

I was saving posts, replying to you both. Didn't work did it? :)