Official Fulqrum Publishing forum

Official Fulqrum Publishing forum (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/index.php)
-   IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/forumdisplay.php?f=189)
-   -   Friday Official Update, June 29, 2012 DISCUSSION THREAD (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/showthread.php?t=32915)

AbortedMan 07-04-2012 05:22 AM

With all the desperation regarding trees you'd think this is a "forest simulator." if you're playing this game, or quitting, because of trees you're playing the wrong game in the first place.

O_Smiladon 07-04-2012 05:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AbortedMan (Post 441117)
With all the desperation regarding trees you'd think this is a "forest simulator." if you're playing this game, or quitting, because of trees you're playing the wrong game in the first place.

I am sure people have right to have the complete package which includes trees and shadows.

AbortedMan 07-04-2012 05:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O_Smiladon (Post 441118)
I am sure people have right to have the complete package which includes trees and shadows.

Of course, I'm not disputing that [redacted], but there are much more higher priority things that the devs should fix first, like 109s flight models and how they seemingly snap into a flat spin upon any abrupt maneuver (I was denied 3 separate dogfights today by 109s going into the drink due to spins upon moving to engage, would have rather actually had a dogfight instead of watching them plummet to the ground.), Hurricanes not starting, launcher crashes, etc. When a players game crashes as he's lining up a kill, or a 109 pilot flails wildly into the ocean as a result of a minor elevator adjustment I'm sure the last thing going through their mind is, "Gee, I wish they'd fix these trees!"

Let's cheer for critical gameplay fixes *first*, then trees, clouds, reflections, tracers, etc.

EDIT: oh and by the way, on the contrary, no one has "rights" to the "complete package." If 1C said tomorrow, "the game now includes nothing but models and no textures...just flat colors" and uploaded a patch to the official steam version that enforced that statement, there is nothing you can do as you do not have "rights" to anything 1C creates, only a license to play what they offer. Just sayin'.

CrusaderOne 07-04-2012 06:15 AM

rebbot fixed slow fps
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Volksieg (Post 439318)
LOL Yep... got rid of the Ubisoft logo (Will they ever fix that one? lol Then again.. who wants their game associated with that bunch so they probably want us to delete the logo. :D).

Just did a clean install and popped the patch on top of that and.....

....believe it or not.. it's now even worse.

Looks like my CloD days are well and truly over. :( Still.. I will say that HSFX 6.0 is the dogs doodahs so my flying days ain't over just yet, at least. lol

You have likely already tried a reboot, but here is an experience I just had:

After installing this newest patch last night, I was getting notably better frame rates. Put my puter to "sleep" for the night...woke it up today and frame rates were lower than they ever had been (6-20). I rebooted and frame rates shot back up to 65-85. Deleting cache and restarting COD did not help...only after reboot did frame rates go back up. In my case, my guess is COD did not like running on a computer that just woke up instead of booting from bios.

I must say though that this patch has brought with it a lot more CTD occurrences for me. CTD's have been very rare for me, until this patch.


******EDIT: Started the pc from sleep mode again today and ran COD. Frame rate was ok this time.*****


ASUS Crosshair V formula
XFX Radeon HD6990
Phenom II X6 1100T 3.3Ghz--clocked @ 4.00 GHz AMD
32 gigs DDR3 1600 MHz corsair mem
Coolit Vantage liquid cooler for cpu
1000 watt Thermaltake power unit
Windows 7 64-bit

jamesdietz 07-06-2012 03:32 PM

Oh ... the Frederich...can the Gustav be far behind?Fingers crossed it all works !

Kobold10 07-07-2012 11:01 AM

I would prefer to have some EN4 and E7 versions of the BF 109 for COD....

skouras 07-07-2012 01:24 PM

the E4 is already there
the E7 is almost the same with the configuration to have drop tanks

robtek 07-07-2012 01:31 PM

Didn't the E7 had the DB601N engine?

csThor 07-07-2012 01:49 PM

No it had the same DB 601 A as the previous Emils. The only Emils who got the DB 601N received the /N suffix to their designation.

VO101_Tom 07-07-2012 02:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by robtek (Post 442255)
Didn't the E7 had the DB601N engine?

Hi. The DB 601/N wasn't the dafault engine of the E-7, but – of course – it was used in E-7/N and E-4/N too.


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:30 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.