Official Fulqrum Publishing forum
Page 103 of 144 « First 35393101102 103 104105113 Last »
Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

Official Fulqrum Publishing forum (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/index.php)
-   Daidalos Team discussions (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/forumdisplay.php?f=202)
-   -   4.12 development update discussion and feedback (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/showthread.php?t=31734)

ElAurens 03-29-2013 03:52 PM
How will the new mach drag affect, say, a high speed dive?

Luno13 03-29-2013 04:27 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bearcat (Post 500478)
Hmmm ..

I hope that winds up being a good thing..
I don't think it can be a bad thing, but I'll wait to fly them before I judge. I'm pretty excited about the new mach effects, visual effects, and finally options to remove that infernal "Mission Over" in glowing red letters! Opening up the sound files is a great decision also. I can't wait to mess around with it.

Very nice stuff DT! Will there be a PDF release or does that come with the patch itself?

EJGr.Ost_Caspar 03-30-2013 09:39 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ElAurens (Post 500492)
How will the new mach drag affect, say, a high speed dive?
At very high speed, drag will be more important/influencing. The practical result is, that you will have a lower speed at the end of a long steep dive, than before. As said, its subtle.

See here: http://forum.1cpublishing.eu/showpos...6&postcount=15

ElAurens 03-30-2013 12:50 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by EJGr.Ost_Caspar (Post 500534)
At very high speed, drag will be more important/influencing. The practical result is, that you will have a lower speed at the end of a long steep dive, than before. As said, its subtle.

See here: http://forum.1cpublishing.eu/showpos...6&postcount=15

Ah, I had forgotten about that chart.

No more "supersonic" dive speeds, very good.

daidalos.team 03-30-2013 01:18 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Treetop64 (Post 500490)
Do references to Michael Bay movies count?

Didn't think so...

Hehe! As long as we get the same amount of money like him, everything is possible... :grin:


EDIT: just kidding!

Gel-ler 03-30-2013 01:38 PM
Great work Gent´s!!!
With the improvements You are doing and the Hardware we have today Il21946 is still a please to fly!!!
Thanks:-P

IceFire 03-30-2013 01:54 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by majorfailure (Post 500457)
Few more: The size of flashes from exploding large caliber HE e.g. - MK 103 engulfs whole vehicles while the size of flashes from small bombs e. g. 100lbs is barely visible.
Tracers are visible from 20 km away while explosions of own bombs when levelbombing at 5k is too far away to be seen.
4.12 is quite different in all of those areas. The enhanced effects I think will be very appreciated.

Toni74 03-30-2013 02:39 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by daidalos.team (Post 500466)
Dear IL-2 fans,

Flight model changes

- Adjusted FM "length" parameter of all Bf 109s from F to K versions to the correct value of 8.94 meters.
The 109's F to K overall length was 9020 mm.

_1SMV_Gitano 03-30-2013 02:43 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Toni74 (Post 500561)
The 109's F to K overall length was 9020 mm.
Based on?

I too have publications reporting 9.02 meters but the scanned manuals say 8.94 meters.

Treetop64 03-30-2013 04:25 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by _1SMV_Gitano (Post 500562)
Based on?

I too have publications reporting 9.02 meters but the scanned manuals say 8.94 meters.
Was the Emil and earlier models shorter due to the differences in the engine cowl/propeller boss design and different tail assembly?


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:26 AM.
Page 103 of 144 « First 35393101102 103 104105113 Last »
Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.